NEET-UG 2026 Re-exam Highlights: Whistle-blower reveals chilling details as CBI makes more arrests in paper leak probe
The NEET-UG 2026 examination held on May 3 has turned into a nightmare for more than 22 lakh students who appeared with hopes of securing a medical seat. The announcement of the exam’s cancellation on May 12, followed by multiple arrests and an expanding investigation reaching the National Testing Agency (NTA), has raised larger questions about the credibility of the examination body itself.

The cancellation of NEET-UG 2026 has turned into one of the biggest examination controversies in recent years. More than 22 lakh medical aspirants who appeared for the exam on May 3 are now preparing to sit for the examination again on June 21 after allegations of a paper leak triggered investigations, arrests and a CBI probe.
The controversy began with reports emerging from Rajasthan, where investigators found a handwritten “guess paper” that allegedly matched a large number of questions asked in the actual NEET examination.
Questions over examination integrity quickly spread online, followed by protests from students and parents demanding clarity from the National Testing Agency (NTA).
As scrutiny increased, law enforcement agencies traced possible leak routes across multiple states including Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Haryana and Delhi.
Investigators reportedly found overlaps of more than 120 questions between leaked material and the final examination paper, intensifying concerns over whether the exam process had been compromised.
The NTA cancelled the NEET-UG 2026 examination on May 12, stating that findings shared by investigative agencies raised sufficient concern over the fairness of the examination.
The agency said a re-exam would be conducted and candidates would not need to register again. Existing candidature details would remain valid and examination fees would be refunded.
The Centre later handed over the matter to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which registered an FIR under charges including criminal conspiracy, cheating and offences under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024.
NEET-UG 2026 controversy: Timeline
- May 3, 2026
NEET-UG 2026 conducted across India for more than 22 lakh candidates.
- May 4–7
Reports emerge regarding circulation of a “guess paper” resembling actual examination questions.
Investigators and teachers in Rajasthan reportedly compare leaked material with the official paper and identify significant overlaps.
- May 7–8
Inputs regarding alleged irregularities and possible paper leak reach the NTA and investigative agencies.
Rajasthan’s Special Operations Group (SOG) expands the inquiry.
- May 10
NTA issues communication indicating concerns are under examination.
Discussions around examination integrity intensify online.
- May 12
NTA officially cancels NEET-UG 2026 conducted on May 3.
Government orders a CBI investigation.
NTA confirms re-examination and says no fresh application will be required. Fees will be refunded.
- May 13
CBI registers FIR and begins investigation.
Five accused arrested from Jaipur, Gurugram and Nashik.
Searches conducted at multiple locations.
- May 14–15
Probe widens across states.
CBI arrests two more accused and conducts raids at 14 locations.
Total arrests rise to seven.
Investigators examine alleged links between coaching networks and leaked material.
- May 16 onward
CBI seeks extended custody of accused.
Probe expands into multiple states.
Investigators examine individuals described as subject experts and alleged coaching-related connections.
What happens next?
The re-examination is expected to be held in June. Reports indicate all registered candidates will have to appear again. Authorities have also signalled broader reforms, including discussions around shifting NEET to a computer-based mode in future years to reduce risks of paper leaks.
The controversy has renewed questions around the credibility of high-stakes examinations in India, the functioning of the NTA, and whether structural reforms promised after previous exam crises have been implemented.
Opposition leaders have sought accountability, while student groups continue to raise concerns over mental stress, financial burden and repeated disruptions in entrance examinations.