Following the Rose Avenue Court verdict, the National Convenor of the BJP's IT cell, Amit Malviya, asked if Kejriwal was so honest, then why did the Delhi government roll back the existing excise policy?
"If Arvind Kejriwal was so honest, why did the Delhi government roll back and alter the policy once irregularities were flagged? Why were multiple phones and SIM cards destroyed? Why was the number of vendors reduced so sharply while commissions were increased from 6% to 12%? These decisions raise serious and legitimate questions. The kickbacks are not a figment of imagination; they are issues placed before the courts and the public," he wrote on X.
"The people of Delhi have already expressed their verdict through the ballot. Now, the judiciary will continue its examination. With further levels of judicial scrutiny pending, the final word is yet to be written," he further added.
He also said that the legal battle is far from being over.
"The judgment in the Delhi excise case has come from a lower court. In the past, even the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India have made strong and damning observations in related proceedings. Whether this judgment withstands scrutiny in higher courts remains to be seen. The legal process is far from over."