Bharathiraja: The man who made Kamal look 'ugly', cut a Rs 3,000 deal with Rajini

Bharathiraja, the filmmaker who pitched 16 Vayathinile in a soiled dhoti and reshaped Tamil cinema, has died at 84 on June 10. His rural realism, outdoor locations and eye for Kamal Haasan, Rajinikanth and Sridevi altered Indian cinema's course.

advertisement
Bharathiraja 16 Vayathinile feature
When Kamal Haasan and Rajinikanth took pay cuts for Bharathiraja's 16 Vayathinile.

The man who walked into Kamal Haasan's office in 1977 did not look like someone who was about to change Indian cinema. His dhoti was dirty and shirt crumpled. He had no producer behind him, no distributor willing to touch his script, and a budget so thin that when he ran out of money for slow-motion equipment, he simply asked his actors to move in slow motion themselves.

advertisement

That man, who braved all odds, was Bharathiraja.

When Bharathiraja approached him, Kamal Haasan, already a rising name in Tamil cinema, heard him out anyway. "Had I turned the offer down on the basis of his dirty clothes, I wouldn't have been here talking to you," Kamal recalled in 2017. "After listening to the script, I realised he was such a genius," he added.

Nobody knew that the film that soiled-dhoti man had come to pitch would run for 175 days in theatres, reshape the careers of two actors who would go on to become Tamil cinema's biggest icons, plant the seed of Sridevi's eventual Bollywood journey, and become the first Tamil film ever shot predominantly outdoors.

Bharathiraja, who died in Chennai on June 10, 2026, aged 84, had understood something about cinema that most of his contemporaries had not: that the land itself could be a character.

advertisement

The anger that fuelled his passion

Before Bharathiraja became a director, he wanted to be an actor – and was frank about why it hadn't worked. "I came into this industry to become a star. But in those days, you needed a doll-like face to be a hero. Handsome men like Gemini Ganesan and AVM Rajan were heroes then. With my rugged features, I did not stand a chance," he said in a 2017 interview. The rejection didn't drive him out of the cinema. It drove him toward a counter-argument. "Because I had lost, I was seething in anger and decided that I would make a star out of everyone. A character need not be beautiful," he said.

That philosophy became the spine of 16 Vayathinile, his debut directorial. He made Kamal grow out his curly hair, drape a lungi, and button up a rough khadi shirt for his role as the rural protagonist Gopalakrishnan – confessing that he had deliberately wanted to make Kamal look "ugly," not as an insult but as a departure from what Tamil cinema had decided its heroes should resemble.

Kamal, who had come in demanding Rs 30,000, eventually accepted Rs 27,000. He put his trust in the man with the soiled dhoti.

Rajinikanth and the negotiation nobody won

advertisement

In 1977, Rajinikanth was not yet a superstar. When Bharathiraja approached him to play Parattaiyan in 16 Vayathinile – the film's village ruffian – the two men entered a negotiation that Bharathiraja later recalled with undisguised amusement: "Rajinikanth asked for Rs 5,000 as a fee. I told him it was a very small-budget film and I couldn't afford it. He then asked for Rs 4,000, then finally came down to Rs 3,000, which I agreed to pay."

Rajinikanth remembered his final figure as Rs 2,500. Either way, both men cut themselves down in service of something they believed in.

The working relationship produced one of Tamil cinema's more entertaining long-running contradictions. Decades after the film made Rajinikanth a household name, Bharathiraja still couldn't quite bring himself to call him a great actor.

In 2017, Rajinikanth, speaking at the launch of Bharathiraja's film institute in Chennai, delivered the punchline himself. "I like him very much. He likes me as a good person but doesn't like me as an actor. In his old interviews, when journalists asked his opinion on me, he would say, 'He is a good human being.' He never accepted me as a good actor," he said.

advertisement

Then, with characteristic wit: "I could read his face and hear his mind's voice. He always wondered how I became such a big actor."

The friendship survived politics too, where the two men repeatedly landed on opposing sides. Bharathiraja was disarmingly candid about the damage he'd done: "I have issued many statements against him. I have hurt him a lot. But he forgets all that and shows affection to me. He doesn't have a revenge mentality. He's a great man, a great soul."

The fourteen-year-old Sridevi who wept for a village

The third pillar of 16 Vayathinile was Sridevi, fourteen years old when Bharathiraja found her and cast her as Mayil. He had written the character as roughly sixteen – a Class 9 student – but something in Sridevi's eyes stopped him. He described it as a "dreamy sparkle" that matched exactly what he had imagined. She agreed, without hesitation, to appear without makeup - a meaningful professional trust for a teenager in an industry that ran on cosmetic artifice.

On the final day of the shoot, she wept. When Bharathiraja asked why, she told him she would miss the village where they had filmed. "That's when I figured how emotional she was as a person," he recalled in 2018, after her death.

advertisement

He later brought her to Hindi cinema too, directing her in Solva Sawan (1979), a Hindi remake of 16 Vayathinile, despite her initial reluctance to make the leap. It was her Bollywood debut as a lead actor. The rest belongs to film history.

16 Vayathinile was made for Rs 5 lakh. It earned Rs 10 lakh, ran for 175 days, and was remade in Telugu within a year. The three performers it sent into the world – Kamal Haasan, Rajinikanth, Sridevi – became three of the most consequential figures in Indian cinema's twentieth century.

And Tamil directors, for the first time, began looking outside their studio walls with the realisation that the dust, the heat, the ordinary faces and unheroic beauty of rural Tamil Nadu were worth filming.

Bharathiraja spent the rest of his career making that same argument – winning six National Film Awards, receiving the Padma Shri in 2004, and earning the honorific tag of Iyakkunar Imayam (the pinnacle of directors) from an industry that does not give such names lightly.

The man in the soiled dhoti had walked into a young actor's office nearly fifty years ago with a script about a girl, two rivals, and a village. Tamil cinema walked out of the studio to follow him and never entirely went back inside.

- Ends
Published By:
K Janani
Published On:
Jun 10, 2026 15:34 IST

The man who walked into Kamal Haasan's office in 1977 did not look like someone who was about to change Indian cinema. His dhoti was dirty and shirt crumpled. He had no producer behind him, no distributor willing to touch his script, and a budget so thin that when he ran out of money for slow-motion equipment, he simply asked his actors to move in slow motion themselves.

That man, who braved all odds, was Bharathiraja.

When Bharathiraja approached him, Kamal Haasan, already a rising name in Tamil cinema, heard him out anyway. "Had I turned the offer down on the basis of his dirty clothes, I wouldn't have been here talking to you," Kamal recalled in 2017. "After listening to the script, I realised he was such a genius," he added.

Nobody knew that the film that soiled-dhoti man had come to pitch would run for 175 days in theatres, reshape the careers of two actors who would go on to become Tamil cinema's biggest icons, plant the seed of Sridevi's eventual Bollywood journey, and become the first Tamil film ever shot predominantly outdoors.

Bharathiraja, who died in Chennai on June 10, 2026, aged 84, had understood something about cinema that most of his contemporaries had not: that the land itself could be a character.

The anger that fuelled his passion

Before Bharathiraja became a director, he wanted to be an actor – and was frank about why it hadn't worked. "I came into this industry to become a star. But in those days, you needed a doll-like face to be a hero. Handsome men like Gemini Ganesan and AVM Rajan were heroes then. With my rugged features, I did not stand a chance," he said in a 2017 interview. The rejection didn't drive him out of the cinema. It drove him toward a counter-argument. "Because I had lost, I was seething in anger and decided that I would make a star out of everyone. A character need not be beautiful," he said.

That philosophy became the spine of 16 Vayathinile, his debut directorial. He made Kamal grow out his curly hair, drape a lungi, and button up a rough khadi shirt for his role as the rural protagonist Gopalakrishnan – confessing that he had deliberately wanted to make Kamal look "ugly," not as an insult but as a departure from what Tamil cinema had decided its heroes should resemble.

Kamal, who had come in demanding Rs 30,000, eventually accepted Rs 27,000. He put his trust in the man with the soiled dhoti.

Rajinikanth and the negotiation nobody won

In 1977, Rajinikanth was not yet a superstar. When Bharathiraja approached him to play Parattaiyan in 16 Vayathinile – the film's village ruffian – the two men entered a negotiation that Bharathiraja later recalled with undisguised amusement: "Rajinikanth asked for Rs 5,000 as a fee. I told him it was a very small-budget film and I couldn't afford it. He then asked for Rs 4,000, then finally came down to Rs 3,000, which I agreed to pay."

Rajinikanth remembered his final figure as Rs 2,500. Either way, both men cut themselves down in service of something they believed in.

The working relationship produced one of Tamil cinema's more entertaining long-running contradictions. Decades after the film made Rajinikanth a household name, Bharathiraja still couldn't quite bring himself to call him a great actor.

In 2017, Rajinikanth, speaking at the launch of Bharathiraja's film institute in Chennai, delivered the punchline himself. "I like him very much. He likes me as a good person but doesn't like me as an actor. In his old interviews, when journalists asked his opinion on me, he would say, 'He is a good human being.' He never accepted me as a good actor," he said.

Then, with characteristic wit: "I could read his face and hear his mind's voice. He always wondered how I became such a big actor."

The friendship survived politics too, where the two men repeatedly landed on opposing sides. Bharathiraja was disarmingly candid about the damage he'd done: "I have issued many statements against him. I have hurt him a lot. But he forgets all that and shows affection to me. He doesn't have a revenge mentality. He's a great man, a great soul."

The fourteen-year-old Sridevi who wept for a village

The third pillar of 16 Vayathinile was Sridevi, fourteen years old when Bharathiraja found her and cast her as Mayil. He had written the character as roughly sixteen – a Class 9 student – but something in Sridevi's eyes stopped him. He described it as a "dreamy sparkle" that matched exactly what he had imagined. She agreed, without hesitation, to appear without makeup - a meaningful professional trust for a teenager in an industry that ran on cosmetic artifice.

On the final day of the shoot, she wept. When Bharathiraja asked why, she told him she would miss the village where they had filmed. "That's when I figured how emotional she was as a person," he recalled in 2018, after her death.

He later brought her to Hindi cinema too, directing her in Solva Sawan (1979), a Hindi remake of 16 Vayathinile, despite her initial reluctance to make the leap. It was her Bollywood debut as a lead actor. The rest belongs to film history.

16 Vayathinile was made for Rs 5 lakh. It earned Rs 10 lakh, ran for 175 days, and was remade in Telugu within a year. The three performers it sent into the world – Kamal Haasan, Rajinikanth, Sridevi – became three of the most consequential figures in Indian cinema's twentieth century.

And Tamil directors, for the first time, began looking outside their studio walls with the realisation that the dust, the heat, the ordinary faces and unheroic beauty of rural Tamil Nadu were worth filming.

Bharathiraja spent the rest of his career making that same argument – winning six National Film Awards, receiving the Padma Shri in 2004, and earning the honorific tag of Iyakkunar Imayam (the pinnacle of directors) from an industry that does not give such names lightly.

The man in the soiled dhoti had walked into a young actor's office nearly fifty years ago with a script about a girl, two rivals, and a village. Tamil cinema walked out of the studio to follow him and never entirely went back inside.

- Ends
Published By:
K Janani
Published On:
Jun 10, 2026 15:34 IST

Read more!
advertisement

Explore More