Advertisement

JNU students' slogans spark political storm, BJP brands protesters 'urban Naxals'

In this edition of To The Point, the focus is on the renewed controversy at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) following the Supreme Court's denial of bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. The JNU administration has filed a complaint at the Vasant Kunj police station naming JNUSU President Aditi Mishra and others for allegedly raising 'anti-national' slogans against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has strongly condemned the incident, branding the protesters as 'Urban Naxals' and stating, 'Ye tukre tukre gang ka Ek Camp Office ban Gaya.' The programme explores the debate between the students' claim of 'ideological dissent' and the charges of extremism, featuring a panel with ABVP leader Vaibhav Meena, CPI leader Vivek Srivastava, and political analysts Sanjay Jha and Rajat Sethi.

Read More

VIDEOS FROM OTHER SECTIONS

LATEST VIDEOS

Gender segregation, no music rules at 'Islam-friendly' Kerala gym spark row

A major controversy has erupted in Kerala's Palakkad district after a fitness centre announced plans to operate as an Islamic-friendly facility. The proposed model includes strict gender segregation, with separate workout hours and trainers for men and women, alongside a complete ban on loud music. Following widespread online criticism, the initial announcement video was deleted. A subsequent clarification video stated that the fitness centre remains open to individuals of all religious backgrounds and is not restricted to the Muslim community. The initiative aims to accommodate individuals who avoid traditional fitness centres due to religious principles regarding music and mixed-gender environments. Local police authorities have confirmed that no official complaints have been filed against the facility. Administration officials stated that legal action or intervention can only occur if a formal complaint is registered and if the facility's operations are found to violate existing laws. The incident continues to generate debate regarding progressive values and religious accommodations in public spaces.

advertisement