Rs 7 lakh claim, abortion distress: What Twisha Sharma's husband told police

Samarth Singh, husband of former actor-model Twisha Sharma, who was found dead at her matrimonial home, told police that she had been distressed after her abortion and that her behaviour changed after she discovered she was pregnant in April. He also claimed to have given her Rs 7 lakh, without specifying the reason.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has begun an investigation into the matter, after formally taking over the probe from the Bhopal Police.

The agency registered a fresh first information report (FIR) a day after the Supreme Court (SC) called for a free, fair and independent investigation into the 33-year-old’s death on May 12.

Twisha Sharma was found dead at her matrimonial home with her in-laws claiming she died by suicide, while her parents alleged foul play and accused the husband's family of physical assault, mental torture, domestic violence and ultimately her murder.

However, Samarth and his family have claimed that Twisha Sharma's behaviour was erratic and that they did not have a role to play in her death.

Samarth Singh, who was arrested from Jabalpur after remaining absconding for nearly 10 days, is currently on seven-day police remand at Katara Hills police station.

According to police sources, investigators found that many of Samarth’s responses during questioning closely echoed statements earlier made by his mother, former district judge Giribala Singh, who is also named in the FIR.

WHAT SAMARTH SAID

During interrogation, Samarth told investigators that his relationship with Twisha was "normal" in the initial months after their marriage.

He claimed things took an unpleasant turn from April 17 onwards, when Twisha discovered she was pregnant. According to him, Twisha frequently spoke about her previous life in the glamour industry and expressed discomfort with domestic responsibilities.

Samarth alleged that Twisha often said she was unable to adjust to the life of a homemaker and found it difficult to continue living that way.

He claimed these differences gradually led to repeated arguments between the couple.

Investigators also questioned Samarth about an incident in April that he described as a turning point in their relationship.

He told police that the couple had planned to travel to Bengaluru together, but Twisha later refused to accompany him, saying she wanted to visit her brother in Rajasthan’s Ajmer instead.

Samarth told the investigators that he travelled alone to Bengaluru while Twisha went to Ajmer. Samarth also claimed that he later discovered she stayed there for only one day before travelling to Delhi without informing him. He alleged that the incident triggered further disputes between them.

WHAT HAPPENED ON MAY 12?

Recounting the events of May 12 — the night Twisha died — Samarth claimed the day had appeared normal.

According to his statement, the couple had dinner together, took a walk in the residential society park and later watched television at home.

Samarth said he eventually went to sleep while Twisha went downstairs to speak with her family over the phone.

Later that night, he claimed his mother woke him up after receiving a call from Twisha’s mother, who was worried because Twisha was not answering her phone.

According to Samarth, he and his mother then searched the house and allegedly found Twisha hanging from a noose on the terrace.

He claimed they immediately brought her down, attempted CPR and rushed her to AIIMS Bhopal, where doctors declared her dead.

The CBI is also questioning Samarth about the period after the incident, when he allegedly went into hiding.

During interrogation, he admitted that he remained in Jabalpur for over a week and deliberately avoided using his mobile phone to prevent police from tracing his location.

Investigators are now trying to determine who sheltered and assisted him while he was absconding.

However, sources said Samarth has so far refused to reveal the names of anyone who may have helped him.

Twisha’s family has accused Samarth and Giribala Singh of dowry harassment, physical and mental abuse, and tampering with evidence.

Police had earlier registered a case under provisions related to dowry death, cruelty and common intention.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court, which took suo motu cognisance of the case, observed that the death of a young woman was a matter of serious concern and stressed that the truth must emerge through a transparent investigation.