Economic sanctions: Relations between India, US plumb new depths

Atal Bihari VajpayeeAt the best of times US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright is pugnacious, at the worst of times she can be positively vitriolic. Speaking at Washington's Stimson Centre on June 10, she described the nuclear tests in the subcontinent as "a felony against the future".Two days later, speaking to CNN from London she sought to dispel a growing impression in the US that sanctions are an overused and ineffective instrument of recrimination. "It's all sticks and no carrots," she assured.Albright's combativeness proved infectious. Last Thursday, when Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott announced the US administration's punitive measures against India, his tone was positively menacing. "The path down which India and Pakistan have started to move with these tests is a dead end and no one else should follow down that path." The measures would be a warning to all "would-be nuclear-testers".The US strategy is centred on pressuring India to roll back its nuclear programme to the pre-Pokhran II level. But determined not to lose business advantage by imposing unilateral sanctions, the US is using its enormous clout to marshal forces in the Permanent Five (P-5) of the UN and the Group of Eight rich nations to arm-twist India by denying development loans.According to the State Department announcement, exports of nuclear and missile technology would be restricted (which they actually have been for the past 20 years), licences for the export of hi-tech equipment for military and civil use, estimated at some $300 million (Rs 1,260 crore), would be on a case-by-case basis (which is no different from the pre-Pokhran period). In addition, the US "halted any commitments of US Government credits and credit guarantees by US Government's entities", including the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation and the US Export-Import Bank. Private banks too would be prohibited from lending to the Indian Government. All in all, a formidable range of measures that Delhi lost no time in describing as "coercive" but "counter-productive".Talbott's announcement was the climax of a series of elaborate diplomatic moves to browbeat India. First, Washington got the P-5 to meet in Geneva to condemn India and Pakistan and demand they sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as non-nuclear weapons states. Then, on June 11, the G-8 announced it would gang up to oppose loans by international financial institutions. Finally, Albright has made it clear that she intends pushing Kashmir to the global agenda. "I think international attention on it will help."Click here to EnlargeUS actions do not as yet indicate a fatigue with its policy of unilateral sanctions. The US has imposed sanctions 104 times since World War II and an amazing 61 times since President Bill Clinton came to power. India is one of the more "sanctioned" countries, having faced restrictions on all nuclear materials since 1978 and on missile-related goods since 1985. With past experience, the US is not unaware that as time passes sanctions begin to lose their sting."It is clearly testing India's ability to take the heat," says a senior Ministry of Defence official. As an example he cited US rules limiting the export of computers to machines capable of up to 20 MTOPS (million theoretical operations per second) in 1984-85. "Today the limit is 1900 MTOPS, just 100 below the capability of the domestic PARAM supercomputer," he says.Since it appears to be working on a policy designed to get quick results, US pressure will increase. Action is likely to focus on the roughly $1 billion (Rs 4,200 crore) worth of loans that would have been cleared this summer had Pokhran II not occurred. So far the G-8 has only deferred decision on the Indian proposals. It may up the ante by calling for their consideration and voting them down. Since this year's disbursals have already been approved and are not targeted, the impact of such a decision will only be felt next year.Albright's description of India's security concerns as "dangerous nonsense" remains at the root of Indo-US problems. With its avowed pro-Beijing tilt, the White House simply discounts the China factor mentioned by Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee in his letter to Clinton. On June 12, Gordon Oehler, former director of the CIA's Non-Proliferation Centre told the Senate's Foreign Relations Committee that the White House had systematically ignored intelligence inputs on China's missile trade with Pakistan, a charge echoed by right wing Republicans on Capitol Hill.India's blunt response to the US came through Vajpayee's comment to the Washington Post at the end of last week, reiterating India was a nuclear weapons state. But he made it clear that India would have a limited arsenal designed to deter the use of such weapons. This assertion was sought to be countered by Jane's Defence Weekly, which claimed India had the potential of outstripping Britain and France in nuclear capability.Earlier in the week, an Indian spokesman attacked the G-8 for offering "unrealistic prescriptions, couched in the language of pressure". For now, Washington and Delhi are working along lines of strategy that remain on parallel and not converging tracks.On A Sticky Wicket: With Clinton demanding a roll-back and Vajpayee reiterating Indias nuclear weapons status, a meeting of minds remains a distant dreamIndia's calculations are that the US will gradually begin to re-engage India - perhaps over the next year or so. The US has by far been the largest foreign direct investor in India having brought $10 billion (Rs 42,000 crores) into the country since 1991.However, to drive home the fact that the country is no pushover, India may have to take recourse to some imaginative diplomacy, including strategic alliances with those on Capitol Hill who hate Clinton and China equally. There are already whispers of South Block employing powerful lobbyists with strong Republican links. Bob Dole's name has been mentioned in this context.A more substantial answer may well lie in a suggestion by Harbir Singh, chairman of the management department at the Wharton School. India, he believes, should enhance its "relative attractiveness as a place to invest in". He feels that once the "political risks are reduced from the current high" foreign investment flows will resume. Unless they wish to sign on Clinton's dotted line, Vajpayee and his Government have their work cut out for them.Published By: AtMigration Published On: Aug 29, 2012 12:03 IST--- ENDS ---

Download App

Get 37% off on an annual Print +Digital subscription of India Today Magazine

Economic sanctions: Relations between India, US plumb new depths

As the US administration's resolve hardens and economic sanctions are formalised, relations between the world's two great democracies plumb new depths.

PUBLICATIONS

TELEVISION

EVENTS

RADIO

GAMING

USEFUL LINKS

PRINTING

WELFARE

DISTRIBUTION

SYNDICATIONS

WEBSITES

EDUCATION